Defending Fauci

Dr. Anthony Fauci has received a vast load of hatred after he was exposed as a prime mover in the 53 year gain of function germ war program on the corona virus. That CIA program and Fauci's role was revealed in Dr. David Martin's May 3 ^rd speech at the European Union's Parliament building[1]. Dr. Martin is an expert in chemical and biological patents[2]. He said that the corona virus was isolated in 1965. The next year a CIA paper proposed that the corona virus be weaponized. Through the next 53 years the CIA and its contractors worked on “gain of function” (making corona both more vicious and contagious). In 2019 a secret patent was issued to the University of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill for covid-19 as a weaponized virus. A few months later that virus was released in Wuhan, China.

In 1925 the US signed the Geneva Protocol which banned the use of gas or bio weapons in war. In 1972 the US signed the International Biological Weapons Convention. That convention banned not only the use, but also experimentation and production of bio weapons.

In 1950 the US used germ war (via bomb drops) on the N. Koreans. When they objected to the UN that the US was violating the Geneva Protocol, the US flatly denied it. An international panel of germ war experts visited N. Korea in 1951. They verified the N. Korean claims[3]. So the release in Wuhan was just the tip of our germ war program started by order of Franklin Roosevelt in 1943[4].

Why then should Dr. Fauci be defended? For two reasons:

1) Ever since the Greenspan Commission Report on Social Security in 1983[5], politicians on the right have argued that the large bulge of retiring baby boomers would bankrupt Social Security. The rich require hordes of able bodied people seeking work to keep wages low. But retirees are seen as both a drag on the economy and on profits. Thus, by terminating the sick and the old, Dr. Fauci and his CIA compatriots see themselves as keeping our nation trim and fit.

2) Dr. Fauci and the US germ program believe they are moving our planet (in a relativly humane way) toward a long term sustainable human population. A 1992 Stanford research program [6] concluded that our planet could only support about one billion people over the long term. But they pointed out that the longer the planet remains vastly overpopulated, the more that sustainable number would shrink. The world had 5.5 billion people then. It now has almost 8 billion. The well-educated are aware that this surfeit of souls must come to a bad end (starvation, plague or nuclear holocaust). But the well-educated are also mostly the owners of businesses. Business owners require cheap labor for profits. Cheap labor means many job seekers for every job offered. So any effort toward birth control is anathema to the owning class. Any move toward mandatory birth control is also a political third rail for the poorly educated majority. So, Dr. Fauci and his germ warriors believe themselves to be moving our planet toward a sustainable future by accelerating the demise of the unproductive (retired/sick) population.